| Free
Speech
As a teacher I frequently hear young people using a variety of scatological
expressions around campus which, of course, reflect more on insecurity
and immaturity than intelligence. Invariably, some of these sexual and
biological references turn up in written assignments as well. The lead
article in Time magazine a while ago: "It's A Four-letter World Out
There" about the apparent epidemic of profanity in contemporary music,
movies, humor and our daily lives serves to suggest that slang and "freedom
of speech" must not be confused with utility and propriety. In as
much as I too have had to struggle with this type of "speech problem"
all my life, I would like to offer the following counsel to young people.
This is not a simple matter of black and white, right and wrong, First
Amendment or no. On the one hand, it involves deep-seated moral and social
convictions about profanity (such as using the Lord's name in vain) going
back thousands of years. On the other hand, the use or "abuse"
of certain words has some very compelling emotional and constitutional
support. I venture to guess that every single one of us would unhesitatingly
defend the principle of "free speech." At the same time, I would
wager that almost everyone would be equally offended by a wanton harangue
of racist, religious and gender-explicit profanity.
I am reminded of the time after the invasion of Cambodia and the shootings
at Kent State when, across this country college campuses were closed down
in protest. At one rally, a particularly virulent speaker jumped up on
the platform and grabbed the microphone and yelled, "We all know
who the real criminal is so now I want to see how much guts you got so
repeat after me! And then he yelled, "Fuck Nixon!" and there
was a sort of embarrassed silence. He yelled again, "Fuck Nixon!"
and again there was another difficult silence whereupon this guy swore
at us and said we were all a bunch of political whimps and stormed off
the stage.
The fact of the matter was that we had closed the school, shut down the
administration, been tear-gassed, carted off to jail and threatened with
expulsion and he was telling us that we were not "committed"
because we refused to engage in a meaningless display of bad language.
Of course we all despised Richard Nixon, and of course there would have
been a thunderous response if he had said, "Impeach Nixon!"
That is what we were there for, to protest the immoral and unconstitutional
misdeeds of our president (particularly the invasion of Cambodia) and
we wanted him out of the White House. We were not interested in having
sex with him.
First of all, I think we must never forget common decency in our daily
lives. If our friends and associates prefer not to smoke then we mustn't
blow smoke in their face. And likewise, if they are offended by a plethora
of four-letter words then I suggest we have the same obligation to respect
their auditory senses as well as their respiratory system.
Secondly, I feel that what is done in the marketplace and on the museum
walls is not necessarily behavior to be emulated in our private lives.
Time magazine makes an attempt to describe some of the "Heavy
Metal" musicians and the stand-up comedians as "artists"
and therefore, given that license, for us to indulge their capricious
obscenities on the grounds that "art" must be absolutely free,
untethered, new, and different, if sometimes abrasive to our sensibilities
-- a philosophical position I share wholeheartedly. Even so, I might admire
a fine nude painting but that doesn't mean I need to parade around in
my birthday suit does it? Similarly, if Mick Jagger or Dice Clay choose
to inundate us with a cascade of vulgarities pretending to a new art form,
we shouldn't feel obligated to copy their particular art, especially when
it is an art appealing to the lowest common denominator of cultural decency.
Thirdly, as with all things; drugs, alcohol, sex, violence, love and hate,
there must be a balance, a harmony between purpose and application. If
profanity becomes a dominant part of our everyday language what will we
have left for justifiable exclamations? When you smash your thumb with
the hammer you have every right to a good, loud scream, "Shit! God
Damn it!" You deserve the sympathy such an expression will elicit
among those within earshot. But if every other word out of your mouth
is the Lord's name in vain, or reference to a procreative act, who is
going to turn their head or come over and kiss your thumb to make it better
when you need it? Words and meanings are precious and they ought not to
bandied about frivolously.
Fourthly, I would ask young people to forbear the wanton use of four-letter
words on the principle of moral and intellectual indignation, a kind of
ethical snobbishness, if you will. I am not, for a second, suggesting
that anybody is better than anybody else because of the way he/she speaks.
But I am recommending the protection and preservation of our culture,
our moral fiber, our sense of decency and social obligation. We must stand
firm against vulgarity, mediocrity and indecency if we are to move closer
to genuine "melting pot" harmony.
The profaning of our language is but a small step away from the profanation
of our souls. Twenty years ago I made a sort of vow to myself that if
I ever heard a man use the word "nigger" in public I would put
the hurt on him. Well, now the word is back, on television no less, and
people are laughing. When Dice Clay says that "if only they had killed
four more after Martin Luther King, then we would have a whole week off..."
and people laugh, this means we still have many "miles to go and
promises to keep" with regard to racial equality in this country.
So I entreat young people to be intellectual and moral snobs and fight
the skin merchants, racists and recidivists.
Lets face it, profanity is an insubstantial form of expression. For example,
you might despise somebody and I ask why. If you say, "Well, uh,...because
uh, well he's a real asshole, you know what I mean?" Well, obviously
I do not know exactly what you mean because there are a lot of "assholes"
in the world so I don't really have anything specific to grab on to. On
the other hand if you say, "I can't stand him because he is a vulgar,
deceitful, kiss-ass opportunist." You at least, suggest that you
have really given the matter some thought and that there might be some
truth behind this unflattering litany. And even if I happen to like the
fellow in question, your well-put adjectives command respect, if not conversion.
Fifthly, and this is a position with which I am increasingly inclined
to agree, which is that an unceasing use of scatology suggests some kind
of underlying negativism, some deep-seated unhappiness; perhaps worst
of all, an arrogant presumption of insight, "negative chic"
if you will. I protest this analysis on the basis of "free speech"
and existentialist expressionism, and yet if every other word out of my
mouth is a reference to a sex act or physiological waste-management how
else could such expressions be construed than as cynical and negative?
What is more beautiful than making love to some one? And yet the word
for that is the most common expression of contempt and loathing in our
language. It doesn't make any sense.
In conclusion, I would like to say that of course we should defend to
our deaths the rights of others to say what they want, think what they
want, worship as they want, vote as they want. But that does not mean
we have to copy them does it? As conscientious citizens we must fight
for the poor, the underprivileged, the homeless, the war-torn and ravaged
people of the world and to do so we must emulate the sensitive, the good
and the wise men and women of the past and present. As an athlete you
don't copy some second-string klutz who can't even hit the ball do you?
So then, as a moral, ethical and cultural warrior why copy slobs who have
only a limited appreciation of the English language and no respect for
the high socio-cultural values of western European, African and Asian
civilizations? Model your lives and language after heroes like Jefferson
and Lincoln, Gandhi, Mandela and Martin Luther King. To hell with unprincipled
reprobates and mediocrity! Honor great men and women, think like great
men and women...and you will act like great men and women.
|